Version: 1.2
Last-Modified: Apr 4, 2001
Maintained-by: Nils Ellmenreich <nils 'at' gnupg.org>
This is the GnuPG FAQ. The latest HTML version is available here.
The index is generated automatically, so there may be errors here. Not all questions may be in the section they belong to. Suggestions about how to improve the structure of this FAQ are welcome.
Please send additions and corrections to the maintainer. It would be most convenient if you could provide the answer to be included here. Your help is very much appreciated.
Please, don't send message like "This should be a FAQ - what's the answer?". If it hasn't been asked before, it isn't a FAQ. In that case you could search in the mailing list archive.
GnuPG stands for GNU Privacy Guard and is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage. It can be used to encrypt data and to create digital signatures. It includes an advanced key management facility and is compliant with the proposed OpenPGP Internet standard as described in RFC 2440. As such, it is aimed to be compatible with PGP from NAI Inc.
In general, yes. GnuPG and newer PGP releases should be implementing the OpenPGP standard. But there are some interoperability problems. See questions 5.1ff. for details.
Here's a list of on-line resources:
PLEASE: Before posting to a list, read this FAQ and the available documentation. In addition, search the list archive - maybe your question has already been discussed. This way you help people focus on topics that have not yet been resolved.
./docwhere some additional documentation is located (mainly interesting for hackers, not the casual user).
You can download the GNU Privacy Guard from its primary FTP server ftp.gnupg.org or from one of the mirrors: <http://www.gnupg.org/mirror.html> The current version is 1.0.4, please upgrade to this version as it fixes a security bug regarding the verification of multiple signatures.
It should run on most Unices as well as Windows 95 and Windows NT. A list of OSes reported to be OK is presented at http://www.gnupg.org/gnupg.html#supsys .
"Good" random numbers are crucial for the security of your encryption. Different operating systems provide a variety of more or less quality random data. Linux and *BSD provide kernel generated random data through /dev/random - this should be the preferred choice on these systems. Also Solaris users with the SUNWski package installed have a /dev/random. In these cases, use the configure option
--enable-static-rnd=linux. In addition, there's also the kernel random device by Andi Maier <http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi>, but it's still beta. Use at own risk!
On other systems, the Entropy Gathering Daemon (EGD) is a good choice. It is a perl-daemon that monitors system activity and hashes it into random data. See the download page <http://www.gnupg.org/download.html> how to obtain egd. Use
--enable-static-rnd=egdhere.
If the above options do not work, you can use the random number generator "unix". This is very slow and should be avoided. The random quality isn't very good so don't use it on sensitive data.
RSA is included as of GnuPG 1.0.3.
The official GnuPG distribution does not contain IDEA due to a patent restriction. The patent does not expire before 2007 so don't expect official support before then.
However, there is an unofficial modules to include it even in earlier version of GnuPG. It's available from <ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/contrib/>. Look for
idea.c.
Compilation directives are in the headers of these files. Then add the following line to your ~/.gnupg/options:
load-extension idea
1024 bit for DSA signatures; even for plain ElGamal signatures this is sufficient as the size of the hash is probably the weakest link if the key size is larger than 1024 bits. Encryption keys may have greater sizes, but you should then check the fingerprint of this key: "gpg --fingerprint --fingerprint <user ID>".
As for the key algorithms, you should stick with the default (i.e., DSA signature and ElGamal encryption). A ElGamal signing key has the following disadvantages: the signature is larger, it is hard to create such a key useful for signatures which can withstand some real world attacks, you don't get any extra security compared to DSA, there might be compatibility problems with certain PGP versions. It has only been introduced because at the time it was not clear whether there is was patent on DSA.
The problem here is that we need a lot of random bytes and for that we (on Linux the /dev/random device) must collect some random data. It is really not easy to fill the Linux internal entropy buffer; I talked to Ted Ts'o and he commented that the best way to fill the buffer is to play with your keyboard. Good security has its price. What I do is to hit several times on the shift, control, alternate, and caps lock keys, because these keys do not produce output to the screen. This way you get your keys really fast (it's the same thing PGP2 does).
Another problem might be another program which eats up your random bytes (a program (look at your daemons) that reads from /dev/[u]random).
Don't do this at all! You should never create keys or even use GnuPG on a remote system because you normally have no physical control over your secret key ring (which is in most cases vulnerable to advanced dictionary attacks) - I strongly encourage everyone to only create keys on a local computer (a disconnected laptop is probably the best choice) and if you need it on your connected box (I know: We all do this) be sure to have a strong password for your account and for your secret key and that you can trust your system administrator.
When I check GnuPG on a remote system via ssh (I have no Alpha here ;-) I have the same problem. It takes a *very* long time to create the keys, so I use a special option, --quick-random, to generate insecure keys which are only good for some tests.
If you do a 'gpg --help', you will get two separate lists. The first is a list of commands. The second is a list of options. Whenever you run GPG, you must pick exactly one command (with one exception, see below). You may pick one or more options. The command should, just by convention, come at the end of the argument list, after all the options. If the command takes a file (all the basic ones do), the filename comes at the very end. So the basic way to run gpg is:
gpg [--option something] [--option2] [--option3 something] --command file
Some options take arguments, for example the --output option (which can be abbreviated -o) is an option that takes a filename. The option's argument must follow immediately after the option itself, otherwise gpg doesn't know which option the argument is supposed to go with. As an option, --output and its filename must come before the command. The --recipient (-r) option takes a name or keyid to encrypt the message to, which must come right after the -r argument. The --encrypt (or -e) command comes after all the options followed by the file you wish to encrypt. So use
gpg -r alice -o secret.txt -e test.txt
If you write the options out in full, it is easier to read
gpg --recipient alice --output secret.txt --encrypt test.txt
If you're saving it in a file called ".txt" then you'd probably expect to see ASCII-armored text in there, so you need to add the --armor (-a) option, which doesn't take any arguments.
gpg --armor --recipient alice --output secret.txt --encrypt test.txt
If you imagine square brackets around the optional parts, it becomes a bit clearer:
gpg [--armor] [--recipient alice] [--output secret.txt] --encrypt test.txt
The optional parts can be rearranged any way you want.
gpg --output secret.txt --recipient alice --armor --encrypt test.txt
If your filename begins with a hyphen (e.g. "-a.txt"), gnupg assumes this is an option and may complain. To avoid this you have either to use "./-a.txt" or stop the option and command processing with two hyphens: "-- -a.txt". The exception: signing and encrypting at the same time. Use
gpg [--options] --sign --encrypt foo.txt
Because you can only select from the public key ring, there is no direct way to do this. However it is not very complicated to do it anyway. Create a new user id with exactly the same name and you will see that there are now two identical user ids on the secret ring. Now select this user id and delete it. Both user ids will be removed from the secret ring.
"ownertrust" is used instead of "trust" to make clear that this is the value you have assigned to a key to express how much you trust the owner of this key to correctly sign (and so introduce) other keys. "validity", or calculated trust, is a value which says how much GnuPG thinks a key is valid (that it really belongs to the one who claims to be the owner of the key). For more see the chapter "The Web of Trust" in the Manual.
Use "gpg --clearsign --not-dash-escaped ...". The problem with --clearsign is that all lines starting with a dash are quoted with "- "; obviously diff produces many of lines starting with a dash and these are then quoted and that is not good for patch ;-). To use a patch file without removing the cleartext signature, the special option --not-dash-escaped may be used to suppress generation of these escape sequences. You should not mail such a patch because spaces and line endings are also subject to the signature and a mailer may not preserve these. If you want to mail a file you can simply sign it using your MUA.
Use "--encrypt-to your_keyid". You can use more than one of these options. To temporary override the use of this additional keys, you can use the option "--no-encrypt-to".
Use "--no-version --comment ''". Note that the left over blank line is required by the protocol.
This note is printed when UTF8 mapping has to be done. Make sure that the displayed charset is the one you have activated on your system "iso-8859-1" is the most used one, so this is the default. You can change the charset with the option "--charset". It is important that you active character set matches the one displayed - if not, restrict yourself to plain 7 bit ASCII and no mapping has to be done.
gpg --batch --decrypt --list-only --status-fd 1 2>/dev/null | \
awk '/^\[GNUPG:\] ENC_TO / { print $3 }'
There used to be a bug in GnuPG < 1.0.1 which happens only if 3DES or Twofish has been used for symmetric only encryption (this has never been the default). The bug has been fixed but to enable you to decrypt old messages, you should run gpg with the option "--emulate-3des-s2k-bug", decrypt the message and encrypt it again without this option. The option will be removed in 1.1, so better re-encrypt your message now.
You should use the option --batch and don't use pass phrases as there is usually no way to store it more secure than the secret keyring itself. The suggested way to create the keys for the automated environment is:
On a secure machine:
Using GnuPG to encrypt email is one of the most popular uses. Several mail clients or mail user-agents (MUA) support GnuPG at varying degrees. Simplifying a bit, there are two ways a mail can be encrypted with GnuPG: the "old style" ASCII armor, i.e. plain text encryption, and RFC2015 style (previously PGP/MIME, now OpenPGP). The latter has full MIME support. Some MUAs support only one of them, so whichever you actually use depends on your needs as well as the capabilities of your addressee.
The following list is probably not exhaustive:
OpenPGP: Mutt (Unix), Emacs/Mew, Becky2 (Windows, with plugin), TkRat (Unix). There is effort for a Mozilla plugin and Emacs/GNUS has support in the current CVS.
ASCII: Emacs/{VM,GNUS}/MailCrypt, Mutt(Unix), Pine(Unix), and probably many more.
A good overview of PGP-support is present at http://cryptorights.org/pgp-users/pgp-mail-clients.html. Direct GnuPG support is not mentioned, however, it certain cases it may be possible to use a wrapper.
This has been frequently requested. However, the current viewpoint of the GnuPG maintainers is that this would lead to several security issues and will therefore not be implemented in the foreseeable future. However, for some areas of areas of application gpgme could do the trick. You'll find it at ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/gcrypt/alpha/gpgme
Most keyservers don't accept a 'bare' revocation certificate. You have to import the certificate into gpg first:
gpg --import my-revocation.ascthen send the revoked key to the keyservers:
gpg --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --send-keys mykeyid(or use a keyserver web interface for this).
It depends on the PGP version.
You can't do that because PGP 2.x normally uses IDEA which is not supported by GnuPG as it is patented (see 3.3), but if you have a modified version of PGP you can try this:
gpg --rfc1991 --cipher-algo 3des ...
Please don't pipe the data to encrypt to gpg but provide it using a filename; otherwise, PGP 2 will not be able to handle it.
As for conventional encryption, you can't do this for PGP 2.
You need to provide two additional options:
--compress-algo 1 --cipher-algo cast5
You may also use "3des" instead of "cast5", "blowfish" does not work with all versions of pgp5. You may also want to put
compress-algo 1into your ~/.gnupg/options file - this does not affect normal gnupg operation.
This applies to conventional encryption as well.
PGP 2 uses the RSA and IDEA encryption algorithms. Whereas the RSA patent has expired and RSA is included as of GnuPG 1.0.3, the IDEA algorithm is still patented until 2007. Under certain conditions you may use IDEA even today. In that case, you may refer to Question 3.3 about how to add IDEA support to GnuPG and read http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/pgp2x.html to perform the migration.
(empty)
PGP Inc refuses to accept ElGamal keys of type 20 even for encryption. They only support type 16 (which is identical at least for decryption). To be more inter-operable, GnuPG (starting with version 0.3.3) now also uses type 16 for the ElGamal subkey which is created if the default key algorithm is chosen. You may add an type 16 ElGamal key to your public key which is easy as your key signatures are still valid.
PGP 5.x does not accept V4 signatures for data material but OpenPGP requests generation of V4 signatures for all kind of data, that's why GnuPG defaults to them. Use the option "--force-v3-sigs" to generate V3 signatures for data.
There is a script in the tools directory to help you: After you have imported the PGP keyring you can give this command:
$ lspgpot pgpkeyring | gpg --import-ownertrust
where pgpkeyring is the original keyring and not the GnuPG one you might have created in the first step.
Older PGPs probably bail out on some private comment packets used by GnuPG. These packets are fully in compliance with OpenPGP; however PGP is not really OpenPGP aware. A workaround is to export the secret keys with this command:
$ gpg --export-secret-keys --no-comment -a your-key-id
Another possibility is this: by default, GnuPG encrypts your secret key using the Blowfish symmetric algorithm. Older PGPs will only understand 3DES, CAST5, or IDEA symmetric algorithms. Using the following method you can re-encrypt your secret gpg key with a different algo:
$ gpg --s2k-cipher-algo=CAST5 --s2k-digest-algo=SHA1 \
--compress-algo=1 --edit-key <username>
Then use passwd to change the password (just change it to the same thing, but it will encrypt the key with CAST5 this time).
Now you can export it and PGP should be able to handle it.
For PGP 6.x the following options work to export a key:
$ gpg --s2k-cipher-algo 3des --compress-algo 1 --rfc1991 \
--export-secret-keys <Key-ID>
On many systems this program should be installed as setuid(root). This is necessary to lock memory pages. Locking memory pages prevents the operating system from writing them to disk and thereby keeping your secret keys really secret. If you get no warning message about insecure memory your operating system supports locking without being root. The program drops root privileges as soon as locked memory is allocated.
On UnixWare 2.x and 7.x you should install GnuPG with the 'plock' privilege to get the same effect:
filepriv -f plock /path/to/gpg
If you can't or don't want to install GnuPG setuid(root), you can use the option "--no-secmem-warning" or put
no-secmem-warningin your ~/.gnupg/options file (this disables the warning).
On some systems (e.g., Windows) GnuPG does not lock memory pages and older GnuPG versions (<=1.0.4) issue the warning
gpg: Please note that you don't have secure memoryThis warning can't be switched off by the above option because it was thought to be a too serious issue. However, it confused users too much so the warning was eventually removed.
LFS is correctly working in post-1.0.4 CVS. If configure doesn't detect it correctly, try a different (i.e., better) compiler. egcs 1.1.2 works fine, other gccs sometimes don't. BTW, several compilation problems of GnuPG 1.0.3 and 1.0.4 on HP-UX and Solaris were due to broken LFS support.
This happens because the some informations are stored immediately in the trustdb, but the actual trust calculation can be done after the save command. This is a not easy to fix design bug which will be addressed in some future release.
As of GnuPG 1.0.3, the RSA algorithm is included. If you still have a "load-extension rsa" in your .options files, the above message occurs. Just remove the load command from the .options file.
That's a known bug, already fixed in the CVS (and will be in the next release, of course).
Use the option --emulate-md-encode-bug.
Update to GnuPG 1.0.2 or newer.
This is called dash-escaped text and required by OpenPGP. It always happens when a line starts with a dash ("-") and is needed to make the lines that structure signature and text (i.e., "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----") to be the only lines that start with two dashes.
If you use GnuPG to process those messages, the extra dashes are removed. Good mail clients remove those extra dashes when displaying such a message.
Due to different message formats GnuPG is not always able to split a file with multiple signatures unambiguously into its parts. This error message informs you that there is something wrong with the input.
The only way to have multiple signatures in a file is by using the OpenPGP format with one-pass-signature packets (which is GnuPG's default) or the cleartext signed format.
You are most likely using GnuPG on Windows 1.0.2 or older. That's feature isn't yet implemented, but it's a bug not to say it. Newer versions issue a warning. Upgrade to 1.0.4 or newer.
A previous gpg has most likely exited abnormally and left a lock file. Go to ~/.gnupg and look for .*.lock files and remove them.
As of 1.0.3, keys generated with gpg are created with preferences to TWOFISH (and AES since 1.0.4) and that also means that they have the capability to use the new MDC encryption method. This will go into OpenPGP soon and is also suppoted by PGP 7. This new method avoids a (not so new) attack on all email encryption systems.
This in turn means that pre-1.0.3 gpg's have problems with newer key. Because of security fixes, you should keep your gpg installation in a recent state anyway. As a workaround, you can force gpg to use a previous default cipher algo by putting
cipher-algo cast5into your options file.
If you just generated a new key and get this message while encrypting, you've witnessed a bug in 1.0.4. It uses the new AES cipher Rijndael that is incorrectly being referred as "deprecated". Ignore this warning, more recent versions of gpg are corrected.
Due to constraints in most libc implementations, dates beyond 2038-01-19 can't be displayed correctly. 64 bit OSes are not affected by this problem. To avoid printing wrong dates, GnuPG instead prints some question marks. To see the correct value, you can use the options --with-colons and --fixed-list-mode.
Are you sure that it's not been mentioned somewhere on the mailing lists? Did you have a look at the bug list (You'll find a link to the list of reported bugs on the documentation page). If you're not sure about it being a bug, you can send mail to the gnupg-devel list. Otherwise, use the GUUG bug tracking system http://bugs.guug.de/Reporting.html.
GnuPG, first and foremost, is an implementation of the OpenPGP standard (RFC 2440), which is a competing infrastructure, different from X509.
They are both public-key cryptosystems, but how the public keys are actually handled is different.
To generate a secret/public keypair, run
gpg --gen-keyand choose the default values.
Data that is encrypted with a public key can only be decrypted by the matching secret key. The secret key is protected by a password, the public key is not.
So to send your friend a message, you would encrypt your message with his public key, and he would only be able to decrypt it by having the secret key and putting in the password to use his secret key.
GnuPG is also useful for signing things. Things that are encrypted with the secret key can be decrypted with the public key. To sign something, a hash is taken of the data, and then the hash is in some form encoded with the secret key. If someone has your public key, they can verify that it is from you and that it hasn't changed by checking the encoded form of the hash with the public key. A keyring is just a large file that stores keys. You have a public keyring where you store yours and your friend's public keys. You have a secret keyring that you keep your secret key on, and be very careful with this secret keyring: Never ever give anyone else access to it and use a *good* passphrase to protect the data in it. You can 'conventionally' encrypt something by using the option 'gpg -c'. It is encrypted using a passphrase, and does not use public and secret keys. If the person you send the data to knows that passphrase, they can decrypt it. This is usually most useful for encrypting things to yourself, although you can encrypt things to your own public key in the same way. It should be used for communication with partners you know and where it is easy to exchange the passphrases (e.g. with your boy friend or your wife). The advantage is that you can change the passphrase from time to time and decrease the risk, that many old messages may be decrypted by people who accidently got your passphrase. You can add and copy keys to and from your keyring with the 'gpg --import' and 'gpg --export' option. 'gpg --export-secret-keys' will export secret keys. This is normally not useful, but you can generate the key on one machine then move it to another machine. Keys can be signed under the 'gpg --edit-key' option. When you sign a key, you are saying that you are certain that the key belongs to the person it says it comes from. You should be very sure that is really that person: You should verify the key fingerprint
gpg --fingerprint user-id
over phone (if you really know the voice of the other person) or at a
key signing party (which are often held at computer conferences) or at
a meeting of your local GNU/Linux User Group.
Hmm, what else. You may use the option "-o filename" to force output
to this filename (use "-" to force output to stdout). "-r" just lets
you specify the recipient (which public key you encrypt with) on the
command line instead of typing it interactively.
Oh yeah, this is important. By default all data is encrypted in some
weird binary format. If you want to have things appear in ASCII text
that is readable, just add the '-a' option. But the preferred method
is to use a MIME aware mail reader (Mutt, Pine and many more).
There is a small security glitch in the OpenPGP (and therefore GnuPG)
system; to avoid this you should always sign and encrypt a message
instead of only encrypting it.
These are ElGamal Key generated by GnuPG in v3 (rfc1991) packets. The OpenPGP draft later changed the algorithm identifier for ElGamal keys which are usable for signatures and encryption from 16 to 20. GnuPG now uses 20 when it generates new ElGamal keys but still accept 16 (which is according to OpenPGP "encryption only") if this key is in a v3 packet. GnuPG is the only program which had used these v3 ElGamal keys - so this assumption is quite safe.
It works more or less like PGP. The difference is that the trust is computed at the time it is needed. This is one of the reasons for the trustdb which holds a list of valid key signatures. If you are not running in batch mode you will be asked to assign a trust parameter (ownertrust) to a key.
You can see the validity (calculated trust value) using this command.
gpg --list-keys --with-colons
If the first field is "pub" or "uid", the second field shows you the trust:
o = Unknown (this key is new to the system)
e = The key has expired
q = Undefined (no value assigned)
n = Don't trust this key at all
m = There is marginal trust in this key
f = The key is full trusted
u = The key is ultimately trusted; this is only used
for keys for which the secret key is also available.
r = The key has been revoked
d = The key has been disabled
The value in the "pub" record is the best one of all "uid" records. You can get a list of the assigned trust values (how much you trust the owner to correctly sign another person's key)
gpg --list-ownertrustThe first field is the fingerprint of the primary key, the second field is the assigned value:
- = No Ownertrust value yet assigned.
n = Never trust this keyholder to correctly verify others signatures.
m = Have marginal trust in the keyholders capability to sign other
keys.
f = Assume that the key holder really knows how to sign keys.
u = No need to trust ourself because we have the secret key.
Keep these values confidential because they express your opinions about others. PGP stores this information with the keyring thus it is not a good idea to publish a PGP keyring instead of exporting the keyring. gnupg stores the trust in the trust-DB so it is okay to give a gpg keyring away (but we have a --export command too).
This is the internal representation of an user id in the trustdb. "C26EE891" is the keyid, "298" is the local id (a record number in the trustdb) and "09FB" is the last two bytes of a ripe-md-160 hash of the user id for this key.
While checking the validity of a key, GnuPG sometimes prints some information which is prefixed with information about the checked item.
"key 12345678.3456"This is about the key with key ID 12345678 and the internal number 3456, which is the record number of the so called directory record in the trustdb.
"uid 12345678.3456/ACDE"This is about the user ID for the same key. To identify the user ID the last two bytes of a ripe-md-160 over the user ID ring is printed.
"sig 12345678.3456/ACDE/9A8B7C6D"This is about the signature with key ID 9A8B7C6D for the above key and user ID, if it is a signature which is direct on a key, the user ID part is empty (..//..).
No. For example you can add or remove "Comment:" lines. They have a purpose like the mail header lines. However a "Hash:" line is needed for OpenPGP signatures to tell the parser which hash algorithm to use.
The list of preferred algorithms is a list of cypher, hash and compression algorithms stored in the self-signature of a key during key generation. When you encrypt a document, GnuPG uses this list (which is then part of a public key) to determine which algorithms to use. Basically it tells other people what algorithms the recipient is able to handle and provides an order of preference.
Currently the default is hard-wired into the GnuPG source code. You'll have to change
g10/keygen.cand recompile. The function you'll have to change is
keygen_add_std_prefs. The code is pretty self-explanatory. The constants used to denote the algorithms are defined in
include/cipher.h.
After having done that, generate a new key pair (or a new encryption subkey) with the modified executable. This new key will have the modified preferences and can then be used with unmodified executables.
To modify the preferences of an existing key, use a modified executable (see above) to change the expiry date and then save the key. The use your original expiry date and save the key again. Now you've got the prefs changed and can use the key again with your unmodified executable.
Changing the list of preferences with an unmodified GnuPG executable (possibly in the edit-key menu) is on the TODO list and planned for future releases.
Many thanks to Werner Koch for the original FAQ file and to all posters to gnupg-users and gnupg-devel. They all provided most of the answers.
Also thanks to Casper Dik for providing me with a script to generate this FAQ (he uses it for the excellent Solaris2 FAQ).
Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. , 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111, USA
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.