GNU Info

Info Node: (gcc-300.info)Attribute Syntax

(gcc-300.info)Attribute Syntax


Next: Function Prototypes Prev: Function Attributes Up: C Extensions
Enter node , (file) or (file)node

Attribute Syntax
================

   This section describes the syntax with which `__attribute__' may be
used, and the constructs to which attribute specifiers bind, for the C
language.  Some details may vary for C++ and Objective C.  Because of
infelicities in the grammar for attributes, some forms described here
may not be successfully parsed in all cases.

   Note: Function Attributes, for details of the semantics of
attributes applying to functions.  Note: Variable Attributes, for
details of the semantics of attributes applying to variables.  Note:
Type Attributes, for details of the semantics of attributes applying
to structure, union and enumerated types.

   An "attribute specifier" is of the form `__attribute__
((ATTRIBUTE-LIST))'.  An "attribute list" is a possibly empty
comma-separated sequence of "attributes", where each attribute is one
of the following:

   * Empty.  Empty attributes are ignored.

   * A word (which may be an identifier such as `unused', or a reserved
     word such as `const').

   * A word, followed by, in parentheses, parameters for the attribute.
     These parameters take one of the following forms:

        * An identifier.  For example, `mode' attributes use this form.

        * An identifier followed by a comma and a non-empty
          comma-separated list of expressions.  For example, `format'
          attributes use this form.

        * A possibly empty comma-separated list of expressions.  For
          example, `format_arg' attributes use this form with the list
          being a single integer constant expression, and `alias'
          attributes use this form with the list being a single string
          constant.

   An "attribute specifier list" is a sequence of one or more attribute
specifiers, not separated by any other tokens.

   An attribute specifier list may appear after the colon following a
label, other than a `case' or `default' label.  The only attribute it
makes sense to use after a label is `unused'.  This feature is intended
for code generated by programs which contains labels that may be unused
but which is compiled with `-Wall'.  It would not normally be
appropriate to use in it human-written code, though it could be useful
in cases where the code that jumps to the label is contained within an
`#ifdef' conditional.

   An attribute specifier list may appear as part of a `struct',
`union' or `enum' specifier.  It may go either immediately after the
`struct', `union' or `enum' keyword, or after the closing brace.  It is
ignored if the content of the structure, union or enumerated type is
not defined in the specifier in which the attribute specifier list is
used--that is, in usages such as `struct __attribute__((foo)) bar' with
no following opening brace.  Where attribute specifiers follow the
closing brace, they are considered to relate to the structure, union or
enumerated type defined, not to any enclosing declaration the type
specifier appears in, and the type defined is not complete until after
the attribute specifiers.

   Otherwise, an attribute specifier appears as part of a declaration,
counting declarations of unnamed parameters and type names, and relates
to that declaration (which may be nested in another declaration, for
example in the case of a parameter declaration).  In future, attribute
specifiers in some places may however apply to a particular declarator
within a declaration instead; these cases are noted below.  Where an
attribute specifier is applied to a parameter declared as a function or
an array, it should apply to the function or array rather than the
pointer to which the parameter is implicitly converted, but this is not
yet correctly implemented.

   Any list of specifiers and qualifiers at the start of a declaration
may contain attribute specifiers, whether or not such a list may in that
context contain storage class specifiers.  (Some attributes, however,
are essentially in the nature of storage class specifiers, and only make
sense where storage class specifiers may be used; for example,
`section'.)  There is one necessary limitation to this syntax: the
first old-style parameter declaration in a function definition cannot
begin with an attribute specifier, because such an attribute applies to
the function instead by syntax described below (which, however, is not
yet implemented in this case).  In some other cases, attribute
specifiers are permitted by this grammar but not yet supported by the
compiler.  All attribute specifiers in this place relate to the
declaration as a whole.  In the obsolescent usage where a type of `int'
is implied by the absence of type specifiers, such a list of specifiers
and qualifiers may be an attribute specifier list with no other
specifiers or qualifiers.

   An attribute specifier list may appear immediately before a
declarator (other than the first) in a comma-separated list of
declarators in a declaration of more than one identifier using a single
list of specifiers and qualifiers.  At present, such attribute
specifiers apply not only to the identifier before whose declarator
they appear, but to all subsequent identifiers declared in that
declaration, but in future they may apply only to that single
identifier.  For example, in `__attribute__((noreturn)) void d0 (void),
__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2))) d1 (const char *, ...), d2
(void)', the `noreturn' attribute applies to all the functions
declared; the `format' attribute should only apply to `d1', but at
present applies to `d2' as well (and so causes an error).

   An attribute specifier list may appear immediately before the comma,
`=' or semicolon terminating the declaration of an identifier other
than a function definition.  At present, such attribute specifiers apply
to the declared object or function, but in future they may attach to the
outermost adjacent declarator.  In simple cases there is no difference,
but, for example, in `void (****f)(void) __attribute__((noreturn));',
at present the `noreturn' attribute applies to `f', which causes a
warning since `f' is not a function, but in future it may apply to the
function `****f'.  The precise semantics of what attributes in such
cases will apply to are not yet specified.  Where an assembler name for
an object or function is specified (Note: Asm Labels), at present the
attribute must follow the `asm' specification; in future, attributes
before the `asm' specification may apply to the adjacent declarator,
and those after it to the declared object or function.

   An attribute specifier list may, in future, be permitted to appear
after the declarator in a function definition (before any old-style
parameter declarations or the function body).

   An attribute specifier list may appear at the start of a nested
declarator.  At present, there are some limitations in this usage: the
attributes apply to the identifier declared, and to all subsequent
identifiers declared in that declaration (if it includes a
comma-separated list of declarators), rather than to a specific
declarator.  When attribute specifiers follow the `*' of a pointer
declarator, they must presently follow any type qualifiers present, and
cannot be mixed with them.  The following describes intended future
semantics which make this syntax more useful only.  It will make the
most sense if you are familiar with the formal specification of
declarators in the ISO C standard.

   Consider (as in C99 subclause 6.7.5 paragraph 4) a declaration `T
D1', where `T' contains declaration specifiers that specify a type TYPE
(such as `int') and `D1' is a declarator that contains an identifier
IDENT.  The type specified for IDENT for derived declarators whose type
does not include an attribute specifier is as in the ISO C standard.

   If `D1' has the form `( ATTRIBUTE-SPECIFIER-LIST D )', and the
declaration `T D' specifies the type "DERIVED-DECLARATOR-TYPE-LIST
TYPE" for IDENT, then `T D1' specifies the type
"DERIVED-DECLARATOR-TYPE-LIST ATTRIBUTE-SPECIFIER-LIST TYPE" for IDENT.

   If `D1' has the form `* TYPE-QUALIFIER-AND-ATTRIBUTE-SPECIFIER-LIST
D', and the declaration `T D' specifies the type
"DERIVED-DECLARATOR-TYPE-LIST TYPE" for IDENT, then `T D1' specifies
the type "DERIVED-DECLARATOR-TYPE-LIST
TYPE-QUALIFIER-AND-ATTRIBUTE-SPECIFIER-LIST TYPE" for IDENT.

   For example, `void (__attribute__((noreturn)) ****f)();' specifies
the type "pointer to pointer to pointer to pointer to non-returning
function returning `void'".  As another example, `char
*__attribute__((aligned(8))) *f;' specifies the type "pointer to
8-byte-aligned pointer to `char'".  Note again that this describes
intended future semantics, not current implementation.


automatically generated by info2www version 1.2.2.9