|
Whole document tree
LibtoolThis file documents GNU Libtool, a script that allows package developers to provide generic shared library support. This edition documents version 1.4.2a. See section 12.2 Reporting bugs, for information on how to report problems with libtool.
1. IntroductionIn the past, if a source code package developer wanted to take advantage of the power of shared libraries, he needed to write custom support code for each platform on which his package ran. He also had to design a configuration interface so that the package installer could choose what sort of libraries were built. GNU Libtool simplifies the developer's job by encapsulating both the platform-specific dependencies, and the user interface, in a single script. GNU Libtool is designed so that the complete functionality of each host type is available via a generic interface, but nasty quirks are hidden from the programmer.
GNU Libtool's consistent interface is reassuring... users don't need
to read obscure documentation in order to have their favorite source
package build shared libraries. They just run your package
There are several examples throughout this document. All assume the same environment: we want to build a library, `libhello', in a generic way. `libhello' could be a shared library, a static library, or both... whatever is available on the host system, as long as libtool has been ported to it. This chapter explains the original design philosophy of libtool. Feel free to skip to the next chapter, unless you are interested in history, or want to write code to extend libtool in a consistent way.
1.1 Motivation for writing libtoolSince early 1995, several different GNU developers have recognized the importance of having shared library support for their packages. The primary motivation for such a change is to encourage modularity and reuse of code (both conceptually and physically) in GNU programs. Such a demand means that the way libraries are built in GNU packages needs to be general, to allow for any library type the package installer might want. The problem is compounded by the absence of a standard procedure for creating shared libraries on different platforms. The following sections outline the major issues facing shared library support in GNU, and how shared library support could be standardized with libtool. The following specifications were used in developing and evaluating this system:
1.2 Implementation issuesThe following issues need to be addressed in any reusable shared library system, specifically libtool:
1.3 Other implementationsEven before libtool was developed, many free software packages built and installed their own shared libraries. At first, these packages were examined to avoid reinventing existing features. Now it is clear that none of these packages have documented the details of shared library systems that libtool requires. So, other packages have been more or less abandoned as influences.
1.4 A postmortem analysis of other implementationsIn all fairness, each of the implementations that were examined do the job that they were intended to do, for a number of different host systems. However, none of these solutions seem to function well as a generalized, reusable component. Most were too complex to use (much less modify) without understanding exactly what the implementation does, and they were generally not documented. The main difficulty is that different vendors have different views of what libraries are, and none of the packages which were examined seemed to be confident enough to settle on a single paradigm that just works. Ideally, libtool would be a standard that would be implemented as series of extensions and modifications to existing library systems to make them work consistently. However, it is not an easy task to convince operating system developers to mend their evil ways, and people want to build shared libraries right now, even on buggy, broken, confused operating systems. For this reason, libtool was designed as an independent shell script. It isolates the problems and inconsistencies in library building that plague `Makefile' writers by wrapping the compiler suite on different platforms with a consistent, powerful interface. With luck, libtool will be useful to and used by the GNU community, and that the lessons that were learned in writing it will be taken up by designers of future library systems.
2. The libtool paradigmAt first, libtool was designed to support an arbitrary number of library object types. After libtool was ported to more platforms, a new paradigm gradually developed for describing the relationship between libraries and programs. In summary, "libraries are programs with multiple entry points, and more formally defined interfaces." Version 0.7 of libtool was a complete redesign and rewrite of libtool to reflect this new paradigm. So far, it has proved to be successful: libtool is simpler and more useful than before. The best way to introduce the libtool paradigm is to contrast it with the paradigm of existing library systems, with examples from each. It is a new way of thinking, so it may take a little time to absorb, but when you understand it, the world becomes simpler.
3. Using libtoolIt makes little sense to talk about using libtool in your own packages until you have seen how it makes your life simpler. The examples in this chapter introduce the main features of libtool by comparing the standard library building procedure to libtool's operation on two different platforms:
You can follow these examples on your own platform, using the preconfigured libtool script that was installed with libtool (see section 5.3 Configuring libtool). Source files for the following examples are taken from the `demo' subdirectory of the libtool distribution. Assume that we are building a library, `libhello', out of the files `foo.c' and `hello.c'.
Note that the `foo.c' source file uses the The same rule applies whenever you use functions that don't appear in the standard C library... you need to add the appropriate -lname flag to the end of the link line when you link against those objects. After we have built that library, we want to create a program by linking `main.o' against `libhello'.
3.1 Creating object filesTo create an object file from a source file, the compiler is invoked with the `-c' flag (and any other desired flags):
The above compiler command produces an object file, `main.o', from the source file `main.c'. For most library systems, creating object files that become part of a static library is as simple as creating object files that are linked to form an executable:
Shared libraries, however, may only be built from position-independent code (PIC). So, special flags must be passed to the compiler to tell it to generate PIC rather than the standard position-dependent code. Since this is a library implementation detail, libtool hides the complexity of PIC compiler flags by using separate library object files (which end in `.lo' instead of `.o'). On systems without shared libraries (or without special PIC compiler flags), these library object files are identical to "standard" object files. To create library object files for `foo.c' and `hello.c', simply invoke libtool with the standard compilation command as arguments (see section 4.1 Compile mode):
Note that libtool creates two files for each invocation. The `.lo' file is a library object, which may be built into a shared library, and the `.o' file is a standard object file. On `a23', the library objects are just timestamps, because only static libraries are supported. On shared library systems, libtool automatically inserts the PIC generation flags into the compilation command, so that the library object and the standard object differ:
Notice that the second run of GCC has its output discarded. This is done so that compiler warnings aren't annoyingly duplicated.
3.2 Linking libraries
Without libtool, the programmer would invoke the
But of course, that would be too simple, so many systems require that
you run the
It seems more natural to use the C compiler for this task, given
libtool's "libraries are programs" approach. So, on platforms without
shared libraries, libtool simply acts as a wrapper for the system
Again, the libtool library name differs from the standard name (it has a `.la' suffix instead of a `.a' suffix). The arguments to libtool are the same ones you would use to produce an executable named `libhello.la' with your compiler (see section 4.2 Link mode):
Aha! Libtool caught a common error... trying to build a library from standard objects instead of library objects. This doesn't matter for static libraries, but on shared library systems, it is of great importance.
So, let's try again, this time with the library object files. Remember
also that we need to add -lm to the link command line because
`foo.c' uses the Another complication in building shared libraries is that we need to specify the path to the directory in which they (eventually) will be installed (in this case, `/usr/local/lib')(1):
Now, let's try the same trick on the shared library platform:
Now that's significantly cooler... libtool just ran an obscure
Note how libtool creates extra files in the `.libs' subdirectory, rather than the current directory. This feature is to make it easier to clean up the build directory, and to help ensure that other programs fail horribly if you accidentally forget to use libtool when you should.
3.3 Linking executablesIf you choose at this point to install the library (put it in a permanent location) before linking executables against it, then you don't need to use libtool to do the linking. Simply use the appropriate `-L' and `-l' flags to specify the library's location. Some system linkers insist on encoding the full directory name of each shared library in the resulting executable. Libtool has to work around this misfeature by special magic to ensure that only permanent directory names are put into installed executables. The importance of this bug must not be overlooked: it won't cause programs to crash in obvious ways. It creates a security hole, and possibly even worse, if you are modifying the library source code after you have installed the package, you will change the behaviour of the installed programs! So, if you want to link programs against the library before you install it, you must use libtool to do the linking. Here's the old way of linking against an uninstalled library:
Libtool's way is almost the same(2) (see section 4.2 Link mode):
That looks too simple to be true. All libtool did was transform `libhello.la' to `./.libs/libhello.a', but remember that `a23' has no shared libraries. On `burger' the situation is different:
Now assume `libhello.la' had already been installed, and you want to link a new program with it. You could figure out where it lives by yourself, then run:
However, unless `/usr/local/lib' is in the standard library search
path, you won't be able to run
Note that libtool added the necessary run-time path flag, as well as `-lm', the library libhello.la depended upon. Nice, huh? Since libtool created a wrapper script, you should use libtool to install it and debug it too. However, since the program does not depend on any uninstalled libtool library, it is probably usable even without the wrapper script. Libtool could probably be made smarter to avoid the creation of the wrapper script in this case, but this is left as an exercise for the reader.
Notice that the executable, On NetBSD 1.2, libtool encodes the installation directory of `libhello', by using the `-R/usr/local/lib' compiler flag. Then, the wrapper script guarantees that the executable finds the correct shared library (the one in `./.libs') until it is properly installed. Let's compare the two different programs:
The wrapper script takes significantly longer to execute, but at least the results are correct, even though the shared library hasn't been installed yet. So, what about all the space savings that shared libraries are supposed to yield?
Well, that sucks. Maybe I should just scrap this project and take up basket weaving. Actually, it just proves an important point: shared libraries incur overhead because of their (relative) complexity. In this situation, the price of being dynamic is eight kilobytes, and the payoff is about four kilobytes. So, having a shared `libhello' won't be an advantage until we link it against at least a few more programs.
3.4 Debugging executablesIf `hell' was a complicated program, you would certainly want to test and debug it before installing it on your system. In the above section, you saw how the libtool wrapper script makes it possible to run the program directly, but unfortunately, this mechanism interferes with the debugger:
Sad. It doesn't work because GDB doesn't know where the executable lives. So, let's try again, by invoking GDB directly on the executable:
Argh. Now GDB complains because it cannot find the shared library that `hell' is linked against. So, we must use libtool in order to properly set the library path and run the debugger. Fortunately, we can forget all about the `.libs' directory, and just run it on the executable wrapper (see section 4.3 Execute mode):
3.5 Installing librariesInstalling libraries on a non-libtool system is quite straightforward... just copy them into place:(3)
Oops, don't forget the
Libtool installation is quite simple, as well. Just use the
Note that the libtool library `libhello.la' is also installed, to help libtool with uninstallation (see section 4.6 Uninstall mode) and linking (see section 3.3 Linking executables) and to help programs with dlopening (see section 9. Dlopened modules). Here is the shared library example:
It is safe to specify the `-s' (strip symbols) flag if you use a BSD-compatible install program when installing libraries. Libtool will either ignore the `-s' flag, or will run a program that will strip only debugging and compiler symbols from the library. Once the libraries have been put in place, there may be some additional configuration that you need to do before using them. First, you must make sure that where the library is installed actually agrees with the `-rpath' flag you used to build it. Then, running `libtool -n --finish libdir' can give you further hints on what to do (see section 4.5 Finish mode):
After you have completed these steps, you can go on to begin using the installed libraries. You may also install any executables that depend on libraries you created.
3.6 Installing executablesIf you used libtool to link any executables against uninstalled libtool libraries (see section 3.3 Linking executables), you need to use libtool to install the executables after the libraries have been installed (see section 3.5 Installing libraries). So, for our Ultrix example, we would run:
On shared library systems, libtool just ignores the wrapper script and installs the correct binary:
3.7 Linking static libraries
Why return to
If you just want to link this convenience library into programs, then
you could just ignore libtool entirely, and use the old
Using libtool for static library installation protects your library from
being accidentally stripped (if the installer used the `-s' flag),
as well as automatically running the correct But libtool libraries are more than just collections of object files: they can also carry library dependency information, which old archives do not. If you want to create a libtool static convenience library, you can omit the `-rpath' flag and use `-static' to indicate that you're only interested in a static library. When you link a program with such a library, libtool will actually link all object files and dependency libraries into the program. If you omit both `-rpath' and `-static', libtool will create a convenience library that can be used to create other libtool libraries, even shared ones. Just like in the static case, the library behaves as an alias to a set of object files and dependency libraries, but in this case the object files are suitable for inclusion in shared libraries. But be careful not to link a single convenience library, directly or indirectly, into a single program or library, otherwise you may get errors about symbol redefinitions.
When GNU automake is used, you should use As a rule of thumb, link a libtool convenience library into at most one libtool library, and never into a program, and link libtool static convenience libraries only into programs, and only if you need to carry library dependency information to the user of the static convenience library. Another common situation where static linking is desirable is in creating a standalone binary. Use libtool to do the linking and add the `-all-static' flag.
4. Invoking
|
libtool [option]... [mode-arg]... |
and accepts the following options:
less (or
more) or redirect to a file.
If mode is specified, it must be one of the following:
The mode-args are a variable number of arguments, depending on the selected operation mode. In general, each mode-arg is interpreted by programs libtool invokes, rather than libtool itself.
4.1 Compile mode Creating library object files. 4.2 Link mode Generating executables and libraries. 4.3 Execute mode Debugging libtool-generated programs. 4.4 Install mode Making libraries and executables public. 4.5 Finish mode Completing a library installation. 4.6 Uninstall mode Removing installed executables and libraries. 4.7 Clean mode Removing uninstalled executables and libraries.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
For compile mode, mode-args is a compiler command to be used in creating a `standard' object file. These arguments should begin with the name of the C compiler, and contain the `-c' compiler flag so that only an object file is created.
Libtool determines the name of the output file by removing the directory component from the source file name, then substituting the source code suffix (e.g. `.c' for C source code) with the library object suffix, `.lo'.
If shared libraries are being built, any necessary PIC generation flags are substituted into the compilation command. You can pass compiler and linker specific flags using `-Wc,flag' and `-Xcompiler flag' or `-Wl,flag' and `-Xlinker flag', respectively.
If the `-static' option is given, then a `.o' file is built, even if libtool was configured with `--disable-static'.
Note that the `-o' option is now fully supported. It is emulated on the platforms that don't support it (by locking and moving the objects), so it is really easy to use libtool, just with minor modifications to your Makefiles. Typing for example
libtool gcc -c foo/x.c -o foo/x.lo |
Note, however, that, if the compiler does not support `-c' and `-o', it is impossible to compile `foo/x.c' without overwriting an existing `./x.o'. Therefore, if you do have a source file `./x.c', make sure you introduce dependencies in your `Makefile' to make sure `./x.o' (or `./x.lo') is re-created after any sub-directory's `x.lo':
x.o x.lo: foo/x.lo bar/x.lo |
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Link mode links together object files (including library objects) to form another library or to create an executable program.
mode-args consist of a command using the C compiler to create an output file (with the `-o' flag) from several object files.
The following components of mode-args are treated specially:
self libtool will make
sure that the program can dlopen itself, either by enabling
-export-dynamic or by falling back to `-dlpreopen self'.
self, the symbols of the program itself will be added to
lt_preloaded_symbols.
If file is force libtool will make sure that
lt_preloaded_symbols is always defined, regardless of whether
it's empty or not.
dlsym
(see section 9. Dlopened modules).
If the output-file ends in `.la', then a libtool library is created, which must be built only from library objects (`.lo' files). The `-rpath' option is required. In the current implementation, libtool libraries may not depend on other uninstalled libtool libraries (see section 8. Inter-library dependencies).
If the output-file ends in `.a', then a standard library is
created using ar and possibly ranlib.
If output-file ends in `.o' or `.lo', then a reloadable object file is created from the input files (generally using `ld -r'). This method is often called partial linking.
Otherwise, an executable program is created.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
For execute mode, the library path is automatically set, then a program is executed.
The first of the mode-args is treated as a program name, with the rest as arguments to that program.
The following components of mode-args are treated specially:
This mode sets the library path environment variable according to any `-dlopen' flags.
If any of the args are libtool executable wrappers, then they are translated into the name of their corresponding uninstalled binary, and any of their required library directories are added to the library path.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
In install mode, libtool interprets mode-args as an
installation command beginning with cp, or a BSD-compatible
install program.
The rest of the mode-args are interpreted as arguments to that command.
The command is run, and any necessary unprivileged post-installation commands are also completed.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Finish mode helps system administrators install libtool libraries so that they can be located and linked into user programs.
Each mode-arg is interpreted as the name of a library directory. Running this command may require superuser privileges, so the `--dry-run' option may be useful.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Uninstall mode deletes installed libraries, executables and objects.
The first mode-arg is the name of the program to use to delete files (typically `/bin/rm').
The remaining mode-args are either flags for the deletion program (beginning with a `-'), or the names of files to delete.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Clean mode deletes uninstalled libraries, executables, objects and libtool's temporary files associated with them.
The first mode-arg is the name of the program to use to delete files (typically `/bin/rm').
The remaining mode-args are either flags for the deletion program (beginning with a `-'), or the names of files to delete.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
This chapter describes how to integrate libtool with your packages so that your users can install hassle-free shared libraries.
5.1 Writing `Makefile' rules for libtool 5.2 Using Automake with libtool Automatically supporting libtool. 5.3 Configuring libtool Configuring libtool for a host system. 5.4 Including libtool in your package What files to distribute with your package. 5.5 Static-only libraries Sometimes shared libraries are just a pain.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Libtool is fully integrated with Automake (see section `Introduction' in The Automake Manual), starting with Automake version 1.2.
If you want to use libtool in a regular `Makefile' (or `Makefile.in'), you are on your own. If you're not using Automake 1.2, and you don't know how to incorporate libtool into your package you need to do one of the following:
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Libtool library support is implemented under the `LTLIBRARIES' primary.
Here are some samples from the Automake `Makefile.am' in the libtool distribution's `demo' subdirectory.
First, to link a program against a libtool library, just use the `program_LDADD' variable:
bin_PROGRAMS = hell hell.debug # Build hell from main.c and libhello.la hell_SOURCES = main.c hell_LDADD = libhello.la # Create an easier-to-debug version of hell. hell_debug_SOURCES = main.c hell_debug_LDADD = libhello.la hell_debug_LDFLAGS = -static |
The flags `-dlopen' or `-dlpreopen' (see section 4.2 Link mode) would fit better in the program_LDADD variable. Unfortunately, GNU automake, up to release 1.4, doesn't accept these flags in a program_LDADD variable, so you have the following alternatives:
program_LDADD = "-dlopen" libfoo.la program_DEPENDENCIES = libfoo.la |
You may use the `program_LDFLAGS' variable to stuff in any flags you want to pass to libtool while linking `program' (such as `-static' to avoid linking uninstalled shared libtool libraries).
Building a libtool library is almost as trivial... note the use of `libhello_la_LDFLAGS' to pass the `-version-info' (see section 6. Library interface versions) option to libtool:
# Build a libtool library, libhello.la for installation in libdir. lib_LTLIBRARIES = libhello.la libhello_la_SOURCES = hello.c foo.c libhello_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 3:12:1 |
The `-rpath' option is passed automatically by Automake (except for
libraries listed as noinst_LTLIBRARIES), so you
should not specify it.
See section `The Automake Manual' in The Automake Manual, for more information.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Libtool requires intimate knowledge of your compiler suite and operating system in order to be able to create shared libraries and link against them properly. When you install the libtool distribution, a system-specific libtool script is installed into your binary directory.
However, when you distribute libtool with your own packages (see section 5.4 Including libtool in your package), you do not always know which compiler suite and operating system are used to compile your package.
For this reason, libtool must be configured before it can be
used. This idea should be familiar to anybody who has used a GNU
configure script. configure runs a number of tests for
system features, then generates the `Makefiles' (and possibly a
`config.h' header file), after which you can run make and
build the package.
Libtool adds its own tests to your configure script in order to
generate a libtool script for the installer's host machine.
5.3.1 The AC_PROG_LIBTOOLmacroConfiguring libtoolin `configure.in'.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL macro
If you are using GNU Autoconf (or Automake), you should add a call to
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL to your `configure.in' file. This macro
adds many new tests to the configure script so that the generated
libtool script will understand the characteristics of the host:
configure flags.(4) AM_PROG_LIBTOOL was the
old name for this macro, and although supported at the moment is
deprecated.
By default, this macro turns on shared libraries if they are available,
and also enables static libraries if they don't conflict with the shared
libraries. You can modify these defaults by calling either the
AC_DISABLE_SHARED or AC_DISABLE_STATIC macros:
# Turn off shared libraries during beta-testing, since they # make the build process take too long. AC_DISABLE_SHARED AC_PROG_LIBTOOL |
The user may specify modified forms of the configure flags
`--enable-shared' and `--enable-static' to choose whether
shared or static libraries are built based on the name of the package.
For example, to have shared `bfd' and `gdb' libraries built,
but not shared `libg++', you can run all three configure
scripts as follows:
trick$ ./configure --enable-shared=bfd,gdb |
In general, specifying `--enable-shared=pkgs' is the same as configuring with `--enable-shared' every package named in the comma-separated pkgs list, and every other package with `--disable-shared'. The `--enable-static=pkgs' flag behaves similarly, but it uses `--enable-static' and `--disable-static'. The same applies to the `--enable-fast-install=pkgs' flag, which uses `--enable-fast-install' and `--disable-fast-install'.
The package name `default' matches any packages which have not set
their name in the PACKAGE environment variable.
This macro also sets the shell variable LIBTOOL_DEPS, that you can use to automatically update the libtool script if it becomes out-of-date. In order to do that, add to your `configure.in':
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL AC_SUBST(LIBTOOL_DEPS) |
and, to `Makefile.in' or `Makefile.am':
LIBTOOL_DEPS = @LIBTOOL_DEPS@
libtool: $(LIBTOOL_DEPS)
$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
|
If you are using GNU automake, you can omit the assignment, as automake will take care of it. You'll obviously have to create some dependency on `libtool'.
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL.
__declspec(dllexport) and imported with
__declspec(dllimport). If this macro is not used, libtool will
assume that the package libraries are not dll clean and will build only
static libraries on win32 hosts.
This macro must be called before AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, and
provision must be made to pass `-no-undefined' to libtool
in link mode from the package Makefile. Naturally, if you pass
`-no-undefined', you must ensure that all the library symbols
really are defined at link time!
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL to disable
optimization for fast installation. The user may still override this
default, depending on platform support, by specifying
`--enable-fast-install'.
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL to disable
shared libraries. The user may still override this default by
specifying `--enable-shared'.
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL to disable
static libraries. The user may still override this default by
specifying `--enable-static'.
The tests in AC_PROG_LIBTOOL also recognize the following
environment variables:
libtool. If
this is not set, AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will look for gcc or
cc.
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will not use any such flags. It affects
only the way AC_PROG_LIBTOOL runs tests, not the produced
libtool.
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will
not use any such flags. It affects only the way AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
runs tests, not the produced libtool.
libtool requires one).
If this is not set, AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will try to find out what is
the linker used by CC.
libtool when it links a program. If
this is not set, AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will not use any such flags. It
affects only the way AC_PROG_LIBTOOL runs tests, not the produced
libtool.
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL when it links a
program. If this is not set, AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will not use any
such flags. It affects only the way AC_PROG_LIBTOOL runs tests,
not the produced libtool.
nm.
ranlib.
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will check for a suitable
program if this variable is not set.
dlltool. Only meaningful
for Cygwin/MS-Windows.
objdump. Only meaningful
for Cygwin/MS-Windows.
as. Only used on
Cygwin/MS-Windows at the moment.
When you invoke the libtoolize program (see section 5.4.1 Invoking libtoolize), it will tell you where to find a definition of
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. If you use Automake, the aclocal program
will automatically add AC_PROG_LIBTOOL support to your
configure script.
Nevertheless, it is advisable to include a copy of `libtool.m4' in
`acinclude.m4', so that, even if `aclocal.m4' and
`configure' are rebuilt for any reason, the appropriate libtool
macros will be used. The alternative is to hope the user will have a
compatible version of `libtool.m4' installed and accessible for
aclocal. This may lead to weird errors when versions don't
match.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
In order to use libtool, you need to include the following files with your package:
Note that the libtool script itself should not be included with your package. See section 5.3 Configuring libtool.
You should use the libtoolize program, rather than manually
copying these files into your package.
5.4.1 Invoking libtoolizelibtoolizecommand line options.5.4.2 Autoconf `.o' macros Autoconf macros that set object file names.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
libtoolize
The libtoolize program provides a standard way to add libtool
support to your package. In the future, it may implement better usage
checking, or other features to make libtool even easier to use.
The libtoolize program has the following synopsis:
libtoolize [option]... |
and accepts the following options:
`libtoolize --automake' is used by Automake to add libtool files to
your package, when AC_PROG_LIBTOOL appears in your
`configure.in'.
less (or
more) or redirect to a file.
libtoolize won't
overwrite existing files.
libtoolize version information and exit.
If libtoolize detects an explicit call to
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR (see section `The Autoconf Manual' in The Autoconf Manual) in your `configure.in', it
will put the files in the specified directory.
libtoolize displays hints for adding libtool support to your
package, as well.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The Autoconf package comes with a few macros that run tests, then set a variable corresponding to the name of an object file. Sometimes it is necessary to use corresponding names for libtool objects.
Here are the names of variables that list libtool objects:
AC_FUNC_ALLOCA (see section `The Autoconf Manual' in The Autoconf Manual). Is either empty, or contains `alloca.lo'.
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS (see section `The Autoconf Manual' in The Autoconf Manual), and a few other functions.
Unfortunately, the stable release of Autoconf (2.13, at the time of
this writing) does not have any way for libtool to provide support for
these variables. So, if you depend on them, use the following code
immediately before the call to AC_OUTPUT in your
`configure.in':
LTLIBOBJS=`echo "$LIBOBJS" | sed 's/\.[^.]* /.lo /g;s/\.[^.]*$/.lo/'` AC_SUBST(LTLIBOBJS) LTALLOCA=`echo "$ALLOCA" | sed 's/\.[^.]* /.lo /g;s/\.[^.]*$/.lo/'` AC_SUBST(LTALLOCA) AC_OUTPUT(...) |
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
When you are developing a package, it is often worthwhile to configure
your package with the `--disable-shared' flag, or to override the
defaults for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL by using the
AC_DISABLE_SHARED Autoconf macro (see section The AC_PROG_LIBTOOL macro). This prevents libtool from building
shared libraries, which has several advantages:
You may want to put a small note in your package `README' to let other developers know that `--disable-shared' can save them time. The following example note is taken from the GIMP(5) distribution `README':
The GIMP uses GNU Libtool in order to build shared libraries on a variety of systems. While this is very nice for making usable binaries, it can be a pain when trying to debug a program. For that reason, compilation of shared libraries can be turned off by specifying the `--disable-shared' option to `configure'. |
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The most difficult issue introduced by shared libraries is that of
creating and resolving runtime dependencies. Dependencies on programs
and libraries are often described in terms of a single name, such as
sed. So, one may say "libtool depends on sed," and that is
good enough for most purposes.
However, when an interface changes regularly, we need to be more specific: "Gnus 5.1 requires Emacs 19.28 or above." Here, the description of an interface consists of a name, and a "version number."
Even that sort of description is not accurate enough for some purposes. What if Emacs 20 changes enough to break Gnus 5.1?
The same problem exists in shared libraries: we require a formal version system to describe the sorts of dependencies that programs have on shared libraries, so that the dynamic linker can guarantee that programs are linked only against libraries that provide the interface they require.
6.1 What are library interfaces? 6.2 Libtool's versioning system 6.3 Updating